Black Women Hit Hardest With Job Losses Since Recovery Began

Aug 18, 2011 5 Comments by

Allow me to put things in perspective for those still actually “getting it” about Black unemployment in America. You know, the people who don’t understand why Black folks are bitching more than usual? C’mon, we Black people do complain about a lot of things; and yes, some of them can be trivial. But when it comes to money, or the lack thereof? Umm, yeah, that’s something we don’t play about and ain’t played about since we stopped picking cotton for free.

So recently, we found out that the rate of employed Black males hit a forty year low. Yes, the Great Recession has kicked brothas square in the nuts. But a recent report from the National Women’s Law Center shows that the sistas aren’t doing much better. According to them, Black women have lost more jobs than everybody – yes, even m0re than Black men – while the economy has been in recovery. What’s scary about this, is that the recession is officially over.

Check this out:

While the recession hit black men harder than any other group, the economic recovery has shifted that impact to their female counterparts, according to a recent report by the National Women’s Law Center, which shows that black women have lately seen their unemployment rate rise even as other populations—including black men—have finally begun to regain jobs.

Between June 2009 and June 2011, black men gained 127,000 jobs while black women lost more than twice that number, 258,000, the report says. That means that black women have now lost more total jobs than have black men since the recession began in December 2007.

“We hear back from women suggesting that some employers think it’s more important for men to get back to work than for women,” said Joan Entmacher, the National Women’s Law Center’s vice president for family economic security, citing anecdotes from women she has interviewed. “I suspect that is one of the things at work.”

But on the contrary, the report suggests that women are more critical to the economic health of the black population.

“Black women are a majority [53.4%] of the black workforce, head a majority [52.8%] of black families with children, and were more economically vulnerable even before the recession started,” according to the report.

When Mayor Michael Bloomberg earlier this month introduced his “Young Men’s Initiative” program—which will spend $127.5 million to improve education, job placement, health and criminal justice outcomes for young black and Hispanic men—many cheered the effort. But some advocates lament the failure to address women’s economic struggles.

“It’s really important that we pay attention to what’s going on with black men and black male teens and the barriers they face for employment,” said Kate Gallagher Robbins, an analyst at the National Women’s Law Center. “But it’s also critical that we focus on what’s happening for black women and black teen girls.”

In fact, women of all races are suffering disproportionately during the weak recovery, as public sector jobs shrink under the chokehold of tightened budgets. Women hold a high percentage of those jobs, largely because local governments were the first places to implement fair employment practices, said Jeff Hayes, senior research associate at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

“That’s the first place they found good jobs and careers, because there were routinized rules for hiring,” Mr. Hayes said.

With debt deal cuts on the horizon that will further limit public-sector spending, black women and teens aren’t likely to see relief soon.

“Certainly the cuts that have been happening in the government and the public sector are not helpful to these women,” said Ms. Gallagher Robbins. Instead, budget plans should focus on job creation, she said, for example through investments in infrastructure and tax credits for businesses who hire new employees.

“With no assistance to state and local governments, and no talk of any stimulus, it’s looking pretty gloomy—especially for black women,” said Mr. Hayes. (source)

Isn’t it peculiar that not many people are talking about this? Well, not really; I mean, it is Black women we’re talking about here. Nobody in the media especially ever cares about their economic well being.  After all, that’s why they invented TANF and ghetto fabulous platinum EBT cards. But no, instead all you ever see are those stories of hopeless single Black women destined to die alone in a one bedroom apartment surrounded by cats. Didn’t mean to depress you, but, the shit is real.

As women’s job losses mount, some women—especially unmarried women—are facing an increasingly grim job market. Unmarried women have much higher unemployment than married women. In October, 10.3 percent of unmarried women age 20 and over (3.3 million) and 5.7 percent of married women (2.1 million) were unemployed (see figure below; all data by marital status is not seasonally adjusted). Although unmarried women represent less than half (46.5 percent) of all women workers, they account for 6 in 10 (60.8 percent) of women workers who are unemployed. The situation is worse for unmarried women who head families, most of whom are single mothers, who now have an unemployment rate of 12.6 percent, 2.4 percentage points above the national average.

Unmarried women and men have both seen a sharper rise in unemployment over the past year, compared to their married counterparts. Between October 2008 and October 2009, the increase in the unemployment rate of unmarried women (3.6 percentage points) was more than twice the increase of their married counterparts (1.7 percentage points). Unmarried women with families had a 4.1 percentage-point increase over the last year. These trends are reflected among men, too: Unmarried men’s unemployment rate rose 5.0 percentage points over the last year, to 14.1 percent in October; married men’s rose 3.0 percentage points to 6.5 percent. (read more)

Stay strong sisters!

No related content found.

Black Mothers, Budget Cuts, Budget Deficit, Economics, Gender, Politics, Race Matters, Reality, Single Mothers, The Economy, Women

About the author

RiPPa is the creator, publisher, and editor-in-chief of The Intersection of Madness & Reality. As a writer, he uses his sense of humor, sarcasm, and sardonic negro wit to convey his opinion. Being the habitual line-stepper and fire-breathing liberal-progressive, whether others agree with him, isn’t his concern. He loves fried chicken, watermelon, and President Barack Obama. Yes, he's Black; yes, he's proud; and yes, he says it loud. As such, he's often misunderstood.
  • http://primaldata.blogspot.com/ PRIMALDATA

    Hey republicans don’t like black women anyway, and of course if women and minorities rely on a lot of public sector jobs the more public sector jobs you remove the more realistic you make your narrative about minorities being lazy and not wanting to work.  Doesn’t matter if you removed the jobs, look at all these minorities out of work collecting assistance so that their families don’t have to live on the street.

    I hope we get a real plan out of Washington soon to actually start ramping up the public sector jobs. If nobody has any money then the one entity who can technically create it’s own needs to start spending. Business needs direction, they may be too proud to admit that they need the government to show them the way but since they are all hoarding cash yet complaining that markets are slowing down they have made it blatantly obvious that someone needs to show them the way. Again it does not matter how many wonderful products you have to sell if nobody buys them. Stores close down all the time full of merchandise not because they shelves were empty but because the aisles were empty.

    If people are working they will spend money, any other tale to inducing a recovery is a bald face lie and economic fantasy. Nobodies memory is that damn short 1993-2001 SURPLUS 2003-present DEFICIT, and before anybody says oh well if they were off the books how can you blame….. Because the money was still being spent, it doesn’t  matter if you don’t know who is embezzling money from the company, taking supplies from the janitorial closet, or diverting resources to another place when you notice said resources are missing they are still missing. You still have to account for and replace them regardless to if you know who the resource monster is. Everybody has lost a sock in the drier you still have to buy a new pair of socks, the sock is gone, you’ve looked for it you don’t know who or what took it but you still need a PAIR of socks to go about your day. If the current method has not worked, doubling down on it is ridiculous, if the government needs money it has the right and duty to raise:taxes, fees, duties and tariffs, as well as reduce subsidies to industries that no longer need them and to look for inefficiencies in programs that are necessary but have perhaps become a little bloated because we are a much larger and different country than when the program was originally started.

    And by the way certain things should not be for profit:Education, Health Care, Punishment, and War when money is the driving factor behind something you are going to want more money everybody wants more money but what happens when you allow people to make money on those items is that cruelty follows. For the health and future of our nation EVERYONE needs to be educated properly. People need to be HEALTHY having to decide between eating or buying your medication, having electricity or getting a necessary procedure done, between having a place to live or making sure that a parent or loved one is comfortable due to a condition or age. Prison should never be for profit, if we are going to punish people it should be because they are guilty not because I need to make so many dollars for the shareholders.

    War should be a no brainer but it isn’t:War shouldn’t be for profit because the scars left on the minds, bodies, and and resources of the people in the country where the war was fought last generations if not longer. Even those who come home might never be the same mentally because of what they have seen or been forced to deal with. And the fact that the people making the money are hundreds of miles away and in little to no danger of getting physical harm on the battlefield for those profits

    • IntegersCount

      You said “If the current method has not worked, doubling down on it is ridiculous”

      You are dead on. So then why insist on more of the same Democratic failed policies that have done nothing but destroy communities for the last 40 years? It hasn’t and it aint gonna work.

      • http://www.rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

        Can you identify said “Democratic failed policies” that have “done nothing but destroy communities for the last 40 years?”

        • http://primaldata.blogspot.com/ PRIMALDATA

          To hell with that, math is obviously not integers best subject(which thus makes the name the ULTIMATE oxymoron). I want to hear who all these democratic presidents were over the last 40 years, 25 years of republican leadership, just saying we’ve destroyed the country isn’t going to impress anybody but the Tea Party folks, I want you to actually be able to prove it.

      • http://primaldata.blogspot.com/ PRIMALDATA

        Let me get this right George W Bush was a democrat for 8 years from 2001-2009? George H W Bush was a democrat from 1989-1993? Ronald Reagan was a democrat from 1981-1989? Richard Nixon, 1971-1974(because we said the last 40 years right 40 years ago is 1971)? Gerald Ford 1974-1977? lets add that up real quick, fair enough okay I get 8 years for W, 4 years for senior, we’re at 12 right so okay, that means we have 28 years left for “Democratic policies” right, oh wait I’m not done with republican presidents yet, okay hold on. I get 8 more for Ronald reagan right so that has me at 20 year years left from your 40, then Gerald Ford got the last 2 years of nixon so that has me at 18 years, damn thats right I said Nixon so that means I take out 3 more years which knocks me down to 15.

        Well I’ll be damned it seems over the last 40 years ONLY 15 have had Democratic policies in effect. That is the problem with forgetting the past, when you look back the guy in control WASN’T a democrat for the most part of this you know great democratic overstepping of bounds.

        The debt 10 trillion dollars came from Bush, Ronald Reagan had not only raised taxes but raised the debt ceiling. George H W Bush got in trouble because he promised no new taxes and had to raise them anyway.

        I don’t know how old you are, but personally as I have lived through a good portion of the last 40 years but your statement and the guys who have run this country over the time you are talking don’t match up to my life. I’m 36, I was born while Nixon was in office, I went to school while Reagan was in office. I graduated in the transfer between H W and Clinton. I understand how nice it is to talk to someone who agrees with you, but if you are going to talk to someone who LIVED IT talking out ya ass ain gonna work.

        So again it’s nice to come in with talking points, but when it comes to FACTS you come up EXTREMELY short. Thanks for playing