When Mitt Romney Spoke at the NAACP Convention, Dead Slaves Laughed

Jul 13, 2012 15 Comments by

Mitt Romney gave a speech at the NAACP National Convention in Houston this week, and told black people to look into his heart. Sorry Mr. Tin Man, but that’s the same thing they said before the slave ships set sail, so I’m not buying it. Since then, the focus has been on his use of the word ‘Obamacare’ and the subsequent “Boos,” from the crowd in attendance. Not exactly a top 10 moment in Black history, but it was hilarious all the same; seriously, I laughed my ass off.

Yes, the long pause and awkward grin was epic; and I’m pretty sure the thought of doing a jig at that very moment crossed his mind. Surely such a move would have been greatly appreciated and applauded by the hankerchief-head-wearing Negroes he had bused in after picking them out at the Rent-A-Negro Store. You know, the ones who aren’t into getting “free stuff,” who obviously have no intentions of voting for “the other guy,” because, they would rather pick cotton for free for Bain Capital in China. Yeah, those black people; the ones who love what they see when they look into Mitt Romney’s heart. Yep, the not-so-secret black folk openly willing to vote for Mitt, unlike his down-low black supporters somebody has obviously lied to him about. C’mon, y’know he made that up, right?

Hi, my name is. What? My name is. Who? My name is... Mitt Shady.

I just wanted to clear that up, just in case you may think all black people look alike, like Mitt Romney obviously does. Which is really funny when you think about it; because, there is no way black folks should vote for a guy who not only doesn’t know where and what bank his money sits; but also a guy who can’t remember lies about where and when he ran Bain Capital when we’re trying to find employment, in this terrible economy. Sorry pal, but I’m not buying your, “I’m the savior of black people,” sales pitch. And I don’t know what black leaders you’ve been talking to — my guess is that you’re confusing Jesse Lee Peterson for Jesse Jackson, because we all look alike — but if you think your speech was a winner, you won’t be back next year — it’s not like Mitt wants our vote.

This from Mother Jones:

Leonard Alkins, the former head of the Boston NAACP, has few fond memories of Romney’s tenure. ”There was no relationship between the NAACP in Boston and Gov. Mitt Romney and his administration,” Alkins says. “The only time that the NAACP had any interaction with the administration and the governor was to protest when he eliminated the affirmative action office.”

In one of his early acts as governor, Romneydumped the state’s office of affirmative actionand replaced it with the office of diversity and equal opportunity. In doing so, he invalidated a half-dozen executive orders establishing affirmative action policies for women, minorities, veterans, and people with disabilities; diversity training programs; and equal-opportunity standards for state contractors. Romney’s executive orderreplaced all of this with what was essentially a broad—and, Alkins says, “toothless”—commitment to “diversity.”

Romney didn’t inform civil rights groups about his plans before scrapping the affirmative action office, and the reaction from activists was harsh. The Massachusetts Black Caucus accused Romney of attempting to “virtually dismantle affirmative action in Massachusetts state government.”

Romney eventually appointed a diversity commission to examine his new policy. But, according to Alkins, the NAACP was excluded from the commission—until other commissioners spoke up. “He excluded the NAACP from serving on that special commission until we protested,” Alkins recalls.

Romney appointed Alkins to the commission, but the process didn’t go well. Instead of approving Romney’s policy, the commission worked to strengthen the policies he invalidated. Word leaked to the governor, Alkins says, and the co-chair of the commission, Ruth Bramson, who was also Romney’s chief human resources officer, refused to call any more meetings, thwarting the commission from voting on and issuing final recommendations. Bramson, who is now CEO of the Girl Scouts in eastern Massachusetts, refused to comment, saying she has to stay out of politics. The Romney campaign did not respond to a request for comment. But a Romney spokesman told the Bay State Guardian at the time that Bramson felt the committee’s work was done and no further meetings were necessary.

So, do you think Romney really has the interest of black folk at heart? In his speech this week he spoke of his father marching with civil rights activists in the 1960s. But clearly from a policy position, it’s obvious that he doesn’t give a damn about the well being of black folks or anyone outside of his income bracket. If he did, why then would he propose tax cuts for the rich while raising taxes on the middle class and working poor? But hey, let him tell it, he’s the best thing for black folks since Moses and Joseph Smith delivered us from slavery, Jim Crow, and George W. Bush.

email

Comments

comments

Affirmative Action, Affordable Care Act, Barack Obama, Black Church Folk, Black Democrats, Black History, Campaign Meme, Democrats, GOP, Health Care Reform Bill, Healthcare, Hidden Racism, Obama Administration, Political Humor, Politics, Post Racial Society, Race Matters, Racial Stereotypes, Racist Republicans, Republicans, Social Engineering, The Economy, Universal Healthcare, Voter Suppression, White Privilege

About the author

RiPPa is the creator, publisher, and editor-in-chief of The Intersection of Madness & Reality. As a writer, he uses his sense of humor, sarcasm, and sardonic negro wit to convey his opinion. Being the habitual line-stepper and fire-breathing liberal-progressive, whether others agree with him, isn’t his concern. He loves fried chicken, watermelon, and President Barack Obama. Yes, he's Black; yes, he's proud; and yes, he says it loud. As such, he's often misunderstood.
  • http://www.facebook.com/TerryAshwill Terrence Ashwill

    His goal isn’t necessarily to get more black votes than Obama but to simply meet with the black community and make an effort. Obama on the other hand, takes the black vote 100% for granted. All Mitt needs to do is get fewer blacks to show up to the poles. That shouldn’t be hard since the voting record for the black community is terrible. While they may have been excited enough to vote in ’08, this year will probably see a return to the typical voter turnout for blacks which would do a lot of damage to Obama chances.

    Obama got his chance and he blew it. He let down the liberals, the hippies, and the blacks. He hasn’t made one person happy other than his wife who apparently was never proud of her country until he was elected. He is also doing his best to turn us into a welfare state. Which for black people is great but for us producers, that is a step in the wrong direction.

    • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

      Oh really? The voting record for blacks are horrible and we never turn out? Well, how do you explain the over 90% turnout dating back to the last three general election cycles? I would ask you for sources to back up your claims, but I’d hate to waste my time. Oh, and as far as Obama turning this country into a welfare state as you say. I suppose you didn’t know that red states are the ones who receive the most in government assistance and handouts. But again, why waste time with facts and such, right?

  • Matt Noto

    While I can appreciate your point of view (although I would suggest you seek a really good therapist), it would have been better had you not re-posted a discredited (by the Washington Post) passage from a hyper-partisan Mother Jones to make your case

    You can read the false “Romney is a potential criminal” meme debunking, if you’re truly interested. My guess is you aren’t, but here it is anyway.

    http://althouse.blogspot.com/2012/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-obama-campaign.html

    You should also consider the ORIGINAL source — back in 2002 — of the allegation against Romney, which was John McCain’s campaign, and that falsehood has apparently just been recycled.

    http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/146573/

    I’m no fan of Mitt Romney, but really? Is it necessary to lie? When you spread misinformation this way all you’re doing is making it harder for people to take your cause — whatever that may be — seriously.

    • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

      What lies am I spreading about Mitt Romney? The one about his name being on official FEDERAL documents that place him in the position as THE ONE who was running Bain up to 2002, and not 1999 as he says?

      • Matt Noto

        Romney resigned from Bain in 1999, and on the VERY SAME DAY took up a position with the Olympics, and we know this how? Because Romney also filed a mess of paperwork with the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, which for some reason which eludes me at the moment, he was required to file to exactly this affect. And he’s not THE ONE running Bain: he was one of many executives — including several former Mass. democrats — but since you Leftards have no idea of how big business actually works (no one man can run anything. This isn’t Stalin’s USSR, you see), it’s not surprising that you wouldn’t know.

        Perhaps if you read more than Mother Jones and the other Left-leaning propaganda outlets, you’d know these things. Yes, his name is on the document — it has to be as an officer of the company — but he wasn’t running Bain anymore than either of us runs GE, which last time I looked, not only outsources jobs left and right, but also evades taxes while it snuggles up to President Capitalism-is-evil-unless-I-need-a-capitalist’s-money.

        I get you, Rippa: anything that tends to make your man look better, regardless of it’s veracity, is automatically true, and then if it truly isn’t, then what matters is the perception — or at least whatever perception you can manage to contrive — while the Other Guy is the worst thing since Ebola Virus, and no amount of fact-checking or evidence t the contrary will change your opinion.

        • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

          How do you explain Romney earning $100K in 2001 andf 2003 talas CEO of Bain Capital? Forget the documents produced with him signing off as CEO both years. How do you explain someone being paid an actual check for their labor, and not as an investor as filed within his taxes that he refuses to show?
          Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

          • Matt Noto

            And he can show his tax returns just as soon as we see Obama’s college transcripts. Oh, right: Affirmative Action means no real grades, but put that aside for a second.

            I cannot tell you why Romney got 100k, because I’m not the guy who wrote his contract with Bain capital. It is not unusual for officers of a company — even ones who have resigned or taken a leave of absence — to still receive compensation on a basis other than what we would consider “full time employment”. My guess — because I do not know for certain — is that the 100k is a consulting fee of some sort, or at least that’s what someone might call it.

            And in the grand scheme of things, 100k is a mere bag of shells.

            Hell, 100k is nothing: In my 25 years on Wall Street, I once saw a guy get a $32 million golden parachute while HE WAS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR FRAUD (this was the Global Crossing fraud case). If I’m not mistaken, that guy was convicted, too.

            And Obama got how many millions for a pair of autobiographies he didn’t even write, and which apparently contain nothing but fiction, and someone’s making a big deal over 100k? At least Romney got it from an ACTUAL JOB, unlike President Obama, who never had a job outside of government or academia where results hardly ever matter.

            Look, when you start poking into the finances of very wealthy people, you’re going to find a lot of questionable things, and that’s mostly because the tax laws are written in such a way as to allow or reward unfairness. I agree, it’s not right, but then again, this is what happens when you set out to create a “Progressive” tax system that punishes success: the Successful use their money to carve out special privileges. It’s often unseemly, but guess what? it’s not illegal. If we had true tax reform, the worst of the abuses might disappear.

            I’m no fan of Romney (I wanted Gingrich), but I don’t think it’s fair to him to have this sort of smear campaign waged against him, just as it was unfair to hold Obama to the Walk-on-Water standard (even if he DID promise to, almost) considering the troubles he found on his doorstep on Jan. 20, 2009. I would react the same way if someone accused President Frequent-Flyer-Miles of the same thing, sans evidence, and based on a 10-year-old rumor spread by a political opponent (McCain is a nasty bastard), and more-or-less squashed five minutes after it was printed.

            You do understand that the Obama people are accusing Romney of having committed a FELONY, with no evidence to back that up?, except for half-truths, innuendo, half-a-story-here-and-half-a-whisper there, which is usually how Leftards construct conspiracy theories, come to think of it.

            They make the accusation, they tell half the tale, and then they get evasive on the specifics, only to keep hammering away on the original point, never proving anything, but continuing to insist. Right out of Lenin’s playbook.

            If anyone has evidence of Romney doing something illegal, then present it — warts and all — and let the country (or the courts) decide. Since no one has, we must assume that it doesn’t exist, and that this whole thing is a teapot tempest generated for political purposes. Arguably, this is all tantamount to slander, an actual offense before a court of law.

          • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

            Are the sources of higher education questioning his transcripts? No, only the racists such as yourself who have never asked such a question of any president up to this point.

            Our president is black – get over it or kill yourself.

          • Matt Noto

            Oh, and by the way: 30% of Obama’s Income last year came from foreign sources, and the 87k he paid in FOREIGN taxes (do you even MAKE 87k?) were deductible in his US Income Tax return.

            So much for taxing “the rich” and fairness and all that other crap. In addition to making 1.2 million a president, Obama has made himself another 9 million on the side from investments!

            Source:
            http://www.volokh.com/2012/07/13/over-30-of-president-obamas-2009-2011-gross-income-came-from-foreign-sources/

            Hypocrisy.

          • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

            And Romney gets a $77K tax credit for raising a horse. Your point?

  • Val

    What’s lost in all of this is that the Black votes have already been counted for the November election. Everyone knows that 95% or more of Black voters will vote for Obama. And since that is the case how is it possible for Black Americans to demand anything for their collective vote? Well it isn’t possible.

    That’s why when the CBC asked the President to address the higher than average unemployment rate in many Black communities and demographic groups the President declined, choosing only to site trickle down economics as the way that Black Americans could get relief.

    We, African Americans, have allowed the Democrats and the Republicans to play good cop/ bad cop with us for the last 40 years. And in doing so they have effectively eliminated any real choice for us in Presidential elections. We can’t vote for the Republican candidate because we all know that Republicans employ the Southern Strategy. So what’s left? Our only viable choice becomes the Democratic candidate.

    Obama nor Romney need spend much time campaigning to a group whose vote has already been cast. Mitt Romney spoke in front of the NAACP but he was speaking to Whites. And when President Obama speaks in front of a Black audience he too is speaking to Whites.

    Maybe one day we will choose to have some political power. Until then we can just sit on the sidelines and hope that whoever is in office won’t do too much damage to Black America while in office.

    • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

      I fault the Black community for getting the short end of the stick by failing to hold politicians accountable between elections via collective activism.

      • Val

        I agree.

  • George

    Yawn. We all know that affirmative action and “diversity” exist solely for certain blacks to keep playing the victim card.
    BTW, at least Romney had the balls to show up and take what the toddlers had to give. The president sent someone in his place. He figures since yutzes like yourself are gonna vote him anyways, why bother showing up.

    • http://rippdemup.com/ RiPPa

      Yeah, Romney showed up, but he hasn’t said anything specific — unlike what Obama has been saying and doing — to impact the lives of black folks positively. But hey, either you’re in his income bracket (which I doubt) or just too stupid to understand how your vote for Romney works against you.

Facebook

Get the Facebook Likebox Slider Pro for WordPress
Google+