Legislating Morality: Should The Plan B Morning-After Pill Be sold Over The Counter?

Dec 08, 2011 4 Comments by

So the Plan B or morning-after Pill isn’t going to be sold over the counter to females of all ages. Instead, it would be sold to females 17-years-old and older who are able to prove their age. You know, sorta like they do for alcohol and tobacco that some how kids under seventeen somehow manage to still consume. Personally, I think it should be readily available over the counter, but many people I’e spoken with are opposed to this. Some are of the opinion that it being readily available to anyone — especially without a prescription — promotes sexual promiscuity among teen girls in particular. This to me is as idiotic as the notion that if Viagra was sold over the counter, more women would be victims of rape. Absurd I know, but please believe, I’ve had that debate before. No seriously, a friends actually said this to me to justify the sale of birth control pills over the counter.

At any rate, the morning-after pill which is designed to protect a woman from pregnancy immediately after unprotected sex, in no way promotes promiscuity as I see it. In this day and age where having unprotected sex is a gamble with far reaching consequences other than pregnancy. I just don’t see a direct correlation between the availability, or ease of access to the pill, and promiscuity. But president Obama has defended Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and her unprecedented position of making this pill available behind the counter only. In his defense of the measue, president Obama says this is a decision that is one of “common sense.”

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama on Thursday defended his health secretary’s decision to stop the Plan B morning-after pill from moving onto drugstore shelves next to the condoms.

“As the father of two daughters,” he said, “I think it is important for us to make sure that we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine.” The president spoke the morning after his administration stunned major doctors’ groups and women’s health advocates with the decision.

Plan B is a pill that can prevent pregnancy if taken soon enough after unprotected sex. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled scientists at the Food and Drug Administration who were preparing to let Plan B sell without a prescription to people of any age. Sebelius decided that young girls shouldn’t be able to buy the pill on their own, saying she was worried about whether 11-year-olds would know how to use it properly.

Obama said Sebelius made that decision on her own. But he said he thought she was worried about young girls experiencing harmful side effects, saying “I think most parents would probably feel the same way.

For now, Plan B will stay behind pharmacy counters, available without a prescription only to those 17 and older who can prove their age.

Sebelius’ decision is “medically inexplicable,” said Dr. Robert Block of the American Academy of Pediatrics, one of a number of major medical groups that contends over-the-counter access to emergency contraception would lower the nation’s high number of unplanned pregnancies.

Pediatricians say the morning-after pill is safe — containing a high dose of the same female hormone that’s in regular birth control pills — especially compared to some existing over-the-counter medicines.

“I don’t think 11-year-olds go into Rite Aid and buy anything,” much less a single pill that costs about $50, added fellow AAP member Dr. Cora Breuner, a professor of pediatric and adolescent medicine at the University of Washington.

Instead, putting the morning-after pill next to the condoms and spermicides would increase access for those of more sexually active ages “who have made a serious error in having unprotected sex and should be able to respond to that kind of lack of judgment in a way that is timely as opposed to having to suffer permanent consequences,” she said.

The move has election-year implications and angered many Democrats. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a member of the Senate leadership, already was asking Sebelius to explain her decision. But it also could serve to illustrate to independents, whose support will be critical in next fall’s presidential election, that Obama is not the liberal ideologue Republicans claim.

Nor will this end the emergency contraception saga. In 2009, a federal judge said the FDA had let politics, not science, drive its initial behind-the-counter age restrictions and said it should reconsider. At a hearing scheduled in federal court in New York next Tuesday, the Center for Reproductive Rights will argue the FDA should be held in contempt.

Sebelius’ decision pleased conservative critics.

“Take the politics out of it and it’s a decision that reflect the concerns that many parents in America have,” said Wendy Wright, an evangelical activist who helped lead the opposition to Plan B.

“This is the right decision based on a lack of scientific evidence that it’s safe to allow minors access to this drug, much less over-the-counter,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg made clear that the decision is highly unusual. She said her agency’s drug-safety experts had carefully considered the question of young girls and she had agreed that Plan B’s age limit should be lifted.

“There is adequate and reasonable, well-supported and science-based evidence that Plan B One-Step is safe and effective and should be approved for nonprescription use for all females of child-bearing potential,” Hamburg wrote.

But Sebelius said maker Teva Pharmaceuticals hadn’t proved that the very youngest girls who might try Plan B would understand how to use it properly.

A Teva-funded study tracked 11- to 17-year-olds who came to clinics seeking emergency contraception. Nearly 90 percent of them used Plan B safely and correctly without professional guidance, said Teva Vice President Amy Niemann. But Teva wouldn’t say how many of the youngest girls were part of the study.

The company was determining its next steps.

Taking Plan B within 72 hours of rape, condom failure or just forgetting regular contraception can cut the chances of pregnancy by up to 89 percent. But it works best within the first 24 hours. There are two other emergency contraception pills: a two-pill generic version named Next Choice that also is sold behind the counter, and a prescription-only pill named ella.

If a woman already is pregnant, the morning-after pill has no effect. It prevents ovulation or fertilization of an egg. According to the medical definition, pregnancy doesn’t begin until a fertilized egg implants itself into the wall of the uterus. Still, some critics say Plan B is the equivalent of an abortion pill because it may also be able to prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. (source)

So, do tell me where you stand. Should be sold over the counter, by prescription only, or as it is limited to females 17 and older with proper identification? Talk to me, people! Please tell me I’m wrong on this one; personally, it sounds like the legislation of morality for political expediency.

Am I wrong?

Baby Mamas, Politics, Pregnant Women, Sex, Single Mothers, Women, Women's Rights

About the author

RiPPa is the creator, publisher, and editor-in-chief of The Intersection of Madness & Reality. As a writer, he uses his sense of humor, sarcasm, and sardonic negro wit to convey his opinion. Being the habitual line-stepper and fire-breathing liberal-progressive, whether others agree with him, isn’t his concern. He loves fried chicken, watermelon, and President Barack Obama. Yes, he's Black; yes, he's proud; and yes, he says it loud. As such, he's often misunderstood.
  • Anonymous

    I’ve taken the pill once myself b/c a condom got lost during sex. I didn’t consider that there might be an age limit. I mean pregnancy is not the same thing as alcoholism or a drug addiction, or potential for the two, so you can’t make that age equivalence and you have to consider that this is a matter that concerns female-bodied persons specifically.

    Honestly the pill is not that hard to use. All you need is water. That’s it. I started swallowing pill medication when I was in middle school so with either proper guidance or instruction, which pharmacies do provide when you receive your prescription drugs, I think these girls will be just fine. Also all pills come with instructions that are not difficult to understand.

    Honestly, abortions are not just those things you get when you need a fetus removed. Abortions are miscarriages and yes this may also qualify as an abortion. But who cares? This is more an issue of morality than thinking about what is best for young girls and adult women. If there is scientific evidence that the pill is safe for those of child-bearing potential then they should have access to this.

    It reminds me of legislation in California where they contemplated giving parents the right to know of an abortion procedure that involved their minors. At first I thought to vote yes on the proposition but then considered that some families are so over-concerned with morality that they wouldn’t want to think about what is best for their child’s success and livelihood. So parents would be so cruel as to force a child of 11 or 13 to give birth even if that child made a mistake, lost a condom or was perhaps raped? Even if the child is put up for adoption I doubt many young girls want to go through such a painful experience as child birth so young (but more power to those who choose that course of action). 

    It’s normal for teens and pre-teens to start having sex or exploring their sexuality. And on the contrary teen pregnancy is not as common as it used to be. It’s a descending trend. But even so I’m not against teen mothers raising and having kids if they choose to do so. Globally speaking there are many mothers younger than 16, but I want these young girls and women to have options if they have the power to choose whether they give birth or raise children so young. And they should have support.

    If you’ve been raped, if you made a mistake, if you have an abusive and manipulative partner do you want to be forced to carry the product of those already horrible and painful events? I know I freaked the fuck out when the condom got lost in my vagina. And although I was already 22 I can’t imagine being 16 and not having access to plan B just for peace of mind.

  • madhatter

    This pill should be made available to EVERYONE!  ON THE SHELF!  I think Obama is just thinking ahead at all the unplanned pregnancies making future democrats dependent on social programs that democrats love so much.  The birth rate may have diminished over the last couple of years but it  must diminish more.  I’m being taxed out of my home to support all the breeders on social programs.  It would be cheeper to subsidize this pill and lower its cost then to support the lives of all the unplanned babies.

  • http://mybrowneyedview.com msladydeborah

    I have mixed feelings about this particular ruling.  I am pro sexually active people having access to birth control methods.  This just makes good sense and it’s what my generation of women fought for when we were child bearing age.  Many people do not know that we had one helluva time gaining access to birth control if we were single. At one point in time, only women with the title of Mrs. were given unquestionable access to the pill.  The same counter point argument was raised at that time also.  If they access they will be sexually active before marriage versus we are already sexually active give us access to be protected. The argument still stands today.  Even though it is obvious that we have a sexually active society 

    Birth control is usually safe.  But not all hormone systems are the same. There are times when female hormone systems go out of whack.  There’s no way to know this without a medical exam.  This is when taking additional hormones may cause problems.  I question if this pill has the same potential to create internal problems for smoking females?  If you read the information on a lot of contraceptives there are possible side effects. There is a potential health risk for menopause age women who take synthetic hormones.  Most women can tolerate them very well.  I am in that group that cannot.  When your system cannot tolerate the meds, it’s no joke. 

    I do not have a problem with sexually active females having access to the over the counter brand. But I do think that this is the time for adults to really start doing their job at home and teach their daughters and son about responsibility.  I still believe that we need to promote using birth control prior to sexual activity.  Given the high incidents of HIV/AIDS within our race, we have to educate youth on why they need to use condoms and safe sex practices.  Let’s be for real.  There is a possibility that some sexually females would use the over the counter pill as their mainline method instead of the cycle pack.  As I understand it, that is not what it’s designed for and that needs to be made totally clear.

  • Anonymous

    Under age? You need a prescription. That seems about right.