Charles Kinsey Wasn’t “Accidentally” Shot By Police
So somebody in the North Miami connected to and representing their police department thinks I’m stupid. I don’t know who that person might be. However, they must really really really think I’m a fool.
Yep, according to reports, they’re trying to convince me – and everyone paying attention – that, the police didn’t really intend to shoot Charles Kinsey. C’mon, y’all – when have you ever known the police to accidentally shoot a black person? Er, the answer is never. Seriously, the police aren’t interested in wasting precious ammunition that way.
Officer Jonathan Aledda has been identified as the cop who shot Charles Kinsey. Aleda fired three shots at Kinsey, with one shot striking him once in the leg. Again, I’m pretty sure that a cop firing three shots n the vicinity of anyone black is no accident. If anything, they would have emptied the clip.
They won’t accidentally shoot a black person. No, given that they’re almost always justified when they shoot black people. It’s hard to imagine that the police would actually admit to ever doing any wrong, like, ever.
Not even when yo handcuff them after shooting them accidentally.
But no, today they’re saying that they never intended to shoot a black man. Instead, the intended target was an autistic man armed with a toy truck.
Of course, shooting an autistic man armed with a toy truck might sound absurd. But hey, if a 12-year-old boy can be shot for playing with a toy gun on a playground. Shooting a 23-year-old autistic man with a toy truck in the streets makes perfect sense. Y’know, because toys can be dangerous.
Well, maybe not as dangerous as a black man lying on his back with his hands in the air. But at any rate,I hope you get the point. That would be, that people armed with toys are dangerous. Yes, they’re quite the threat.
“I took this job to save lives and help people,” the officer said in a statement released by the police union. “I did what I had to do in a split second to accomplish that and hate to hear others paint me as something I’m not.”
This perfectly explains the released statement of the officer who “accidentally” shot Charles Kinsey. When I first read it, personally, it sounded like he didn’t give a damn that he shot a black man. Which, I’m sure he doesn’t. And yes, I believe he intended to shoot Charles Kinsey. Where he screwed up, in my opinion, is not in killing him. Had he done that, there’d be no need for an absurd explanation. Yes, and Charles Kinsey would be just another hashtag to add to the long list of hurt and pain in black America.
Of course, we’ve seen this before, so, I’m sure you know the answer.
Hell, at this rate, Charles Kinsey is lucky they didn’t come to his house and shoot him n his sleep. You know, because if you’re black, you’re not allowed to have dreams. Yep, I think it’s written into the U.S. Constitution.
Watch the video below: